[campsite-dev] Clarification - IP based subscriptions
  • Vote Up0Vote Down importimport
    Posts: 0Member
    Hi again. Probably one for Mugur here:

    If a user is accessing via IP-based subscription, will identifier> still work just as normal?

    Some of the code I have from the tracker project suggests this might
    *not* be the case but I haven't been able to determine that at this stage.

    Cheers
    JP

    ------------------------------------------
    Posted to Phorum via PhorumMail
  • 2 Comments sorted by
  • Vote Up0Vote Down importimport
    Posts: 0Member
    You can display the user data no matter what subscription type the user has.
    Whether the access is password or IP based the user is still known to the
    parser and is unique.

    Mugur

    --- John Pye wrote:
    > Hi again. Probably one for Mugur here:
    >
    > If a user is accessing via IP-based subscription, will > identifier> still work just as normal?
    >
    > Some of the code I have from the tracker project suggests this might
    > *not* be the case but I haven't been able to determine that at this stage.
    >
    > Cheers
    > JP
    >


    __________________________________________________
    Do You Yahoo!?
    Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
    http://mail.yahoo.com

    ------------------------------------------
    Posted to Phorum via PhorumMail
  • Vote Up0Vote Down importimport
    Posts: 0Member
    Thanks for the responses, Mugur. I added some notes to the manual to
    record this.
    JP

    Mugur Rus wrote:

    >You can display the user data no matter what subscription type the user has.
    >Whether the access is password or IP based the user is still known to the
    >parser and is unique.
    >
    >Mugur
    >
    >--- John Pye wrote:
    >
    >
    >>Hi again. Probably one for Mugur here:
    >>
    >>If a user is accessing via IP-based subscription, will >>identifier> still work just as normal?
    >>
    >>Some of the code I have from the tracker project suggests this might
    >>*not* be the case but I haven't been able to determine that at this stage.
    >>
    >>Cheers
    >>JP
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >
    >
    >__________________________________________________
    >Do You Yahoo!?
    >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
    >http://mail.yahoo.com
    >
    >
    >
Add a Comment