At 12:39 01.03.2005, you wrote:
>I thought the Storage Server was validating the XML sent to it; if so,
>shouldn't it return an error if it's calling not the LS tags but XBMF?
if it throws an error, the question remains if something is catching it - i
guess.
content and media development http://mi.cz
----------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.campware.org -- http://crash.mi.cz -- http://suemi.de
"Good job. Hopefully he will go elsewhere..." (Sava Tatic)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
Posted to Phorum via PhorumMail
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 12:49:01 +0100 Micz Flor wrote:
> At 12:39 01.03.2005, you wrote:
> >I thought the Storage Server was validating the XML sent to it; if so,
> >shouldn't it return an error if it's calling not the LS tags but XBMF?
>
> if it throws an error, the question remains if something is catching it - i
> guess.
Validator is not enabled now - if you would try to test it
But it's configured to LS/DC tags not XBMF now and it will throw
error on XBMF tags and it should be catched by caller.
In more general way - all exceptions should be catched and nonresolveable exceptions may
be displayed as an error msg.
(I will add error logging to storageServer - it may be useful)