PHP5? (was Re: [livesupport-dev] XML schema for livesupport)
  • Vote Up0Vote Down importimport
    Posts: 0Member
    This is a multipart message in MIME format.
    --=_alternative 003B32ECC1256F95_=
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

    So are we agreed about PHP5? Tomas? Sebastian? Micz? Ferenc? Michal?

    doug






    Akos Maroy
    01/25/2005 10:57 AM
    Please respond to livesupport-dev


    To: livesupport-dev@campware.org
    cc: john@curioussymbols.com
    Subject: Re: [livesupport-dev] XML schema for livesupport


    Tomas Hlava wrote:
    > 2) There is probably needed to have XML schema validator callable from
    PHP,
    > but appropriate extension is in PHP5 only (does anybody know if we
    can upgrade?).

    I thing we should, if this is the way to go. in the C++ part we're also
    using very recent libraries, because they are the ones that provide the
    functionality we need.

    > It's possible to call some validator as separate process - it need
    validator
    > as command line utility with some machine readable structured output.

    this would be a huge performance bottleneck, like sinking back to the
    CGI age...


    Akos



    --=_alternative 003B32ECC1256F95_=
    Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"



    So are we agreed about PHP5? Tomas? Sebastian? Micz? Ferenc? Michal?



    doug













    		Akos Maroy <darkeye@tyrell.hu>

    01/25/2005 10:57 AM

    Please respond to livesupport-dev


    		       

            To:        livesupport-dev@campware.org

            cc:        john@curioussymbols.com

            Subject:        Re: [livesupport-dev] XML schema for livesupport






    Tomas Hlava wrote:

    > 2) There is probably needed to have XML schema validator callable from PHP,

    >    but appropriate extension is in PHP5 only (does anybody know if we can upgrade?).



    I thing we should, if this is the way to go. in the C++ part we're also

    using very recent libraries, because they are the ones that provide the

    functionality we need.



    >    It's possible to call some validator as separate process - it need validator

    >    as command line utility with some machine readable structured output.



    this would be a huge performance bottleneck, like sinking back to the

    CGI age...





    Akos






    --=_alternative 003B32ECC1256F95_=--

    ------------------------------------------
    Posted to Phorum via PhorumMail
  • 1 Comment sorted by
  • Vote Up0Vote Down importimport
    Posts: 0Member
    On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:46:38 +0100
    Douglas.Arellanes@mdlf.org wrote:

    > So are we agreed about PHP5? Tomas? Sebastian? Micz? Ferenc? Michal?
    >
    > doug
    >

    Wait please - I'm testing it - there are lot of changes in syntax (fortunately
    mostly extensions).
    It was not very easy to install PHP4.x and PHP5 on the same comp.

    Tomas Hlava
    th@red2head.com

    ------------------------------------------
    Posted to Phorum via PhorumMail
Add a Comment