[campcaster-dev] thin client instead of two-computer setup?
  • Hi,

    I've been checking out Feisty, and one of the things it has is improved
    support for thin clients, especially with sound on the new Pulse Audio
    server. So the question arises: Should we be looking into thin client
    solutions instead of our two-computer setup, which apparently has some
    issues?


    doug
  • 2 Comments sorted by
  • My experience with thin clients is from a number of years ago. It was
    quite complicated to set up the TFTP server and kernel images, as
    well as getting the X server permissions correct.

    -lee

    On Apr 4, 2007, at 11:35 AM, Douglas.Arellanes@mdlf.org wrote:

    > Hi,
    >
    > I've been checking out Feisty, and one of the things it has is
    > improved
    > support for thin clients, especially with sound on the new Pulse Audio
    > server. So the question arises: Should we be looking into thin client
    > solutions instead of our two-computer setup, which apparently has some
    > issues?
    >
    >
    > doug
    >
    >
  • It may be difficult to setup, but once they are running it is easy to
    deploy and manage.

    Lee Azzarello wrote:
    > My experience with thin clients is from a number of years ago. It was
    > quite complicated to set up the TFTP server and kernel images, as well
    > as getting the X server permissions correct.
    >
    > -lee
    >
    > On Apr 4, 2007, at 11:35 AM, Douglas.Arellanes@mdlf.org wrote:
    >
    >> Hi,
    >>
    >> I've been checking out Feisty, and one of the things it has is improved
    >> support for thin clients, especially with sound on the new Pulse Audio
    >> server. So the question arises: Should we be looking into thin client
    >> solutions instead of our two-computer setup, which apparently has some
    >> issues?
    >>
    >>
    >> doug
    >>
    >>
    >
    >