I've been checking out Feisty, and one of the things it has is improved
support for thin clients, especially with sound on the new Pulse Audio
server. So the question arises: Should we be looking into thin client
solutions instead of our two-computer setup, which apparently has some
issues?
My experience with thin clients is from a number of years ago. It was
quite complicated to set up the TFTP server and kernel images, as
well as getting the X server permissions correct.
> Hi,
>
> I've been checking out Feisty, and one of the things it has is
> improved
> support for thin clients, especially with sound on the new Pulse Audio
> server. So the question arises: Should we be looking into thin client
> solutions instead of our two-computer setup, which apparently has some
> issues?
>
>
> doug
>
>
It may be difficult to setup, but once they are running it is easy to
deploy and manage.
Lee Azzarello wrote:
> My experience with thin clients is from a number of years ago. It was
> quite complicated to set up the TFTP server and kernel images, as well
> as getting the X server permissions correct.
>
> -lee
>
> On Apr 4, 2007, at 11:35 AM, Douglas.Arellanes@mdlf.org wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been checking out Feisty, and one of the things it has is improved
>> support for thin clients, especially with sound on the new Pulse Audio
>> server. So the question arises: Should we be looking into thin client
>> solutions instead of our two-computer setup, which apparently has some
>> issues?
>>
>>
>> doug
>>
>>
>
>