Re: [livesupport-dev] Browser compatibility
  • Vote Up0Vote Down importimport
    Posts: 0Member
    At 16:21 23.02.2005, sava.tatic@mdlf.org wrote:

    >We can do without Opera.

    if the rest of the world can, we can, too Wink

    no, seriously: it would be nice, but our target browsers should be firefox,
    mozilla and IE (if we want it or not).


    Micz Flor - micz@mi.cz

    content and media development http://mi.cz
    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.campware.org -- http://crash.mi.cz -- http://suemi.de
    "I told our marketing guys to speak now or forever be silent."
    (Aleksandar Brajanoski)
    -----------------------------------------------------------------

    ------------------------------------------
    Posted to Phorum via PhorumMail
  • 6 Comments sorted by
  • Vote Up0Vote Down importimport
    Posts: 0Member
    We should just invite Opera fans to write a workaround. Shouldn't be too
    difficult, but Sebastian should NOT bother with that.

    Sava



    Micz Flor
    > cc:
    Sent by: Subject: Re: [livesupport-dev] Browser compatibility
    micz.flor@web.de


    02/23/05 04:25 PM
    Please respond to
    livesupport-dev






    At 16:21 23.02.2005, sava.tatic@mdlf.org wrote:

    >We can do without Opera.

    if the rest of the world can, we can, too Wink

    no, seriously: it would be nice, but our target browsers should be firefox,

    mozilla and IE (if we want it or not).


    Micz Flor - micz@mi.cz

    content and media development http://mi.cz
    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.campware.org -- http://crash.mi.cz -- http://suemi.de
    "I told our marketing guys to speak now or forever be silent."
    (Aleksandar Brajanoski)
    -----------------------------------------------------------------

    ------------------------------------------
    Posted to Phorum via PhorumMail
  • Vote Up0Vote Down importimport
    Posts: 0Member
    This is a multipart message in MIME format.
    --=_alternative 001B3663C1256FB2_=
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

    One of my favorite peeves as a web designer would be how, inevitably, on
    every project I worked on, I'd always get some truly annoying person
    saying 'yeah, but does it work with Lynx?'. Which is the same as hearing
    some amateur rock critic say 'yeah, but have you heard their _early_
    stuff?'

    doug





    sava.tatic@mdlf.org
    02/23/2005 04:28 PM
    Please respond to livesupport-dev


    To: livesupport-dev@campware.org
    cc:
    Subject: Re: [livesupport-dev] Browser compatibility



    We should just invite Opera fans to write a workaround. Shouldn't be too
    difficult, but Sebastian should NOT bother with that.

    Sava



    Micz Flor
    livesupport-dev@campware.org, livesupport-dev@campware.org
    > cc:
    Sent by: Subject: Re:
    [livesupport-dev] Browser compatibility
    micz.flor@web.de


    02/23/05 04:25 PM
    Please respond to
    livesupport-dev






    At 16:21 23.02.2005, sava.tatic@mdlf.org wrote:

    >We can do without Opera.

    if the rest of the world can, we can, too Wink

    no, seriously: it would be nice, but our target browsers should be
    firefox,

    mozilla and IE (if we want it or not).


    Micz Flor - micz@mi.cz

    content and media development http://mi.cz
    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.campware.org -- http://crash.mi.cz -- http://suemi.de
    "I told our marketing guys to speak now or forever be silent."
    (Aleksandar Brajanoski)
    -----------------------------------------------------------------









    --=_alternative 001B3663C1256FB2_=
    Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"



    One of my favorite peeves as a web designer would be how, inevitably, on every project I worked on, I'd always get some truly annoying person saying 'yeah, but does it work with Lynx?'. Which is the same as hearing some amateur rock critic say 'yeah, but have you heard their _early_ stuff?'



    doug











    		sava.tatic@mdlf.org

    02/23/2005 04:28 PM

    Please respond to livesupport-dev


    		       

            To:        livesupport-dev@campware.org

            cc:        

            Subject:        Re: [livesupport-dev] Browser compatibility








    We should just invite Opera fans to write a workaround. Shouldn't be too

    difficult, but Sebastian should NOT bother with that.



    Sava





                                                                                                                                         

                         Micz Flor                                                                                                      

                         <micz.flor@web.de        To:       livesupport-dev@campware.org, livesupport-dev@campware.org                  

                         >                        cc:                                                                                    

                         Sent by:                 Subject:  Re: [livesupport-dev] Browser compatibility                                  

                         micz.flor@web.de                                                                                                

                                                                                                                                         

                                                                                                                                         

                         02/23/05 04:25 PM                                                                                              

                         Please respond to                                                                                              

                         livesupport-dev                                                                                                

                                                                                                                                         

                                                                                                                                         









    At 16:21 23.02.2005, sava.tatic@mdlf.org wrote:



    >We can do without Opera.



    if the rest of the world can, we can, too Wink



    no, seriously: it would be nice, but our target browsers should be firefox,



    mozilla and IE (if we want it or not).





    Micz Flor - micz@mi.cz



    content and media development                        http://mi.cz

    -----------------------------------------------------------------

    http://www.campware.org -- http://crash.mi.cz -- http://suemi.de

    "I told our marketing guys to speak now or forever be silent."

    (Aleksandar Brajanoski)

    -----------------------------------------------------------------


















    --=_alternative 001B3663C1256FB2_=--

    ------------------------------------------
    Posted to Phorum via PhorumMail
  • Vote Up0Vote Down importimport
    Posts: 0Member
    I suppose the only other consideration is it "Accessible" from the
    standpoint of WCAG or any of the standards regarding disabled people
    needing access...

    I really hope nobody would be absurd enough to expect lynx to be able
    to function as a control to something this complex.

    On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 05:57:25 +0100, Douglas.Arellanes@mdlf.org
    wrote:
    >
    > One of my favorite peeves as a web designer would be how, inevitably, on
    > every project I worked on, I'd always get some truly annoying person saying
    > 'yeah, but does it work with Lynx?'. Which is the same as hearing some
    > amateur rock critic say 'yeah, but have you heard their _early_ stuff?'
    >
    > doug
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > sava.tatic@mdlf.org
    >
    > 02/23/2005 04:28 PM
    > Please respond to livesupport-dev
    >
    > To: livesupport-dev@campware.org
    > cc:
    > Subject: Re: [livesupport-dev] Browser compatibility
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > We should just invite Opera fans to write a workaround. Shouldn't be too
    > difficult, but Sebastian should NOT bother with that.
    >
    > Sava
    >
    >
    >
    > Micz Flor
    >
    > > livesupport-dev@campware.org, livesupport-dev@campware.org
    > > cc:
    >
    > Sent by: Subject: Re:
    > [livesupport-dev] Browser compatibility
    > micz.flor@web.de
    >
    >
    >
    > 02/23/05 04:25 PM
    >
    > Please respond to
    >
    > livesupport-dev
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > At 16:21 23.02.2005, sava.tatic@mdlf.org wrote:
    >
    > >We can do without Opera.
    >
    > if the rest of the world can, we can, too Wink
    >
    > no, seriously: it would be nice, but our target browsers should be firefox,
    >
    > mozilla and IE (if we want it or not).
    >
    >
    > Micz Flor - micz@mi.cz
    >
    > content and media development http://mi.cz
    > -----------------------------------------------------------------
    > http://www.campware.org -- http://crash.mi.cz -- http://suemi.de
    > "I told our marketing guys to speak now or forever be silent."
    > (Aleksandar Brajanoski)
    > -----------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >

    ------------------------------------------
    Posted to Phorum via PhorumMail
  • Vote Up0Vote Down importimport
    Posts: 0Member
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

    ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C525AC.4A8FAE20
    Content-Type: text/plain;
    charset="us-ascii"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    Hi Guys,

    Nadine have done a nice work on design of HTML User Interface. Please visit
    attched files.
    As always, it?s a hard work to get the design suitable for all common
    browsers. Nadine tested with firefox, netscape, ie and safari. Just IE on
    Mac makes more problems than wanted.
    Due to rarity of this browser, I guess we can ignore this at the moment.

    ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C525AC.4A8FAE20
    Content-Type: text/plain; name="htmlUI_Design_zip"
    Content-Disposition: inline; filename="htmlUI_Design_zip"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

    The htmlUI_Design_zip file that was initially attached to this message has been stored of the mailing lists server :
    http://sympa.mdlf.org/wws/attach/livesupport-dev/DFEFKLCDOEFAJOCIBHPCEEPCCKAA.devel@yellowsunshine.de/htmlUI_Design.zip

    ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C525AC.4A8FAE20--

    ------------------------------------------
    Posted to Phorum via PhorumMail
  • Vote Up0Vote Down importimport
    Posts: 0Member
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
    --------------090109030503020803050508
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    Welcome to the future !

    Symbian, ( sony ericsson P900 )





    clean , clear , and powerfull !! Smile)

    robert

    --------------090109030503020803050508
    Content-Type: text/plain; name="IMG_0718_1_1_JPG"
    Content-Disposition: inline; filename="IMG_0718_1_1_JPG"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

    The IMG_0718_1_1_JPG file that was initially attached to this message has been stored of the mailing lists server :
    http://sympa.mdlf.org/wws/attach/livesupport-dev/42317ED1.4080107@b92.net/IMG_0718_1_1.JPG

    --------------090109030503020803050508--

    ------------------------------------------
    Posted to Phorum via PhorumMail
  • Vote Up0Vote Down importimport
    Posts: 0Member
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

    ------=_NextPart_000_2B19_01C52646.EB61D270
    Content-Type: text/plain;
    charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    Hi,=20

    I think that adding buttons like the C++ GUI might make the HTML =
    interface bulkier than it needs to be, but I agree that the menu looks a =
    little out of place. Maybe using similar colors to the C++ GUI and some =
    rollovers might help as Charles mentioned. I made a test menu and also =
    changed the font to the on/off air buttons to bitstream vera. You can =
    see it at http://a.parsons.edu/~sangita/livesupport/navBar/navBar.html. =


    Otherwise though, it looks great!

    Sangita


    ----- Original Message -----=20
    From: charles truett=20
    To: livesupport-dev@campware.org=20
    Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 12:15 AM
    Subject: [livesupport-dev] HTML GUI



    wow nadine, the HTML looks really good.

    just a few thoughts.

    should the ON AIR and OFF AIR font be consistent with the rest of the=20
    site? it sticks out to me because it's another sans serif.

    maybe the navbar items should be aligned so they spread all the way=20
    across the content - so Campware Home should align to the right
    with the Now Playing Box.

    do you want to use the same buttons we're using in the application in=20
    the web version? i can understand arguments to keep it simpler,
    no graphics and all. But since we're using the tabs from the app=20
    (scheduler_day.html) it might be a good idea.

    and how about rollover states for the navbar, navbar dropdown menus =
    and=20
    buttons? that might be nice.

    but all in all i think it looks super.


    thanks a lot,


    charles



    ------=_NextPart_000_2B19_01C52646.EB61D270
    Content-Type: text/html;
    charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


    0000,0000,0000>
    charset=3Diso-8859-1">




    Hi,
    size=3D2>

    I think that adding buttons like the C++ GUI might make the =
    HTML=20
    interface bulkier than it needs to be, but I agree that the menu looks a =
    little=20
    out of place.  Maybe using similar colors to the C++ GUI and some =
    rollovers=20
    might help as Charles mentioned.  I made a test menu and also =
    changed the=20
    font to the on/off air buttons to bitstream vera.  You can see it =
    at href=3D"http://a.parsons.edu/~sangita/livesupport/navBar/navBar.html">htt=
    p://a.parsons.edu/~sangita/livesupport/navBar/navBar.html. =20


    Otherwise though, it looks great!

     

    Sangita

     

     

    ----- Original Message -----

    style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
    BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
    black">From:=20
    charles =
    truett    =20


    Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 =
    12:15=20
    AM

    Subject: [livesupport-dev] HTML =
    GUI



    wow nadine, the HTML looks really =
    good.

    just a=20
    few thoughts.

    should the ON AIR and OFF AIR font be consistent =
    with the=20
    rest of the
    site? it sticks out to me because it's another sans=20
    serif.

    maybe the navbar items should be aligned so they spread =
    all the=20
    way
    across the content - so Campware Home should align to the=20
    right
    with the Now Playing Box.

    do you want to use the same =
    buttons=20
    we're using in the application in
    the web version? i can =
    understand=20
    arguments to keep it simpler,
    no graphics and all. But since we're =
    using=20
    the tabs from the app
    (scheduler_day.html) it might be a good=20
    idea.

    and how about rollover states for the navbar, navbar =
    dropdown=20
    menus and
    buttons? that might be nice.

    but all in all i =
    think it=20
    looks super.


    thanks a =
    lot,


    charles

    <=
    /BODY>

    ------=_NextPart_000_2B19_01C52646.EB61D270--

    ------------------------------------------
    Posted to Phorum via PhorumMail
Add a Comment
Start a New Discussion

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Apply for Membership

Categories

Poll

No poll attached to this discussion.