There two tabs in the comment screen - "Moderate" and "Approved". I
dont like this wording because one is a verb and the other is an
adjective. Instead of "Moderate", how about "Inbox" or "Pending" or
anything else that works with "Approved".
On 5/25/06, Paul Baranowski wrote:
> There two tabs in the comment screen - "Moderate" and "Approved". I
> dont like this wording because one is a verb and the other is an
> adjective. Instead of "Moderate", how about "Inbox" or "Pending" or
> anything else that works with "Approved".
>
> - Paul
>
this is from Braja, whose tol.org address was not recognized by sympa (it
will be as of today)
why not just follow the CS wording?
NEW and APPROVED
or even more closely
NEW and PUBLISHED
> Pending over Inbox -- or Unapproved?
>
> On 5/25/06, Paul Baranowski wrote:
>> There two tabs in the comment screen - "Moderate" and "Approved". I
>> dont like this wording because one is a verb and the other is an
>> adjective. Instead of "Moderate", how about "Inbox" or "Pending" or
>> anything else that works with "Approved".
>>
>> - Paul
>>
>
>
> --
> Hartman's Brain Consulting | Openflows Networks Ltd.
>
> gpg 1024D/ED6EF59B (7D1A 522F D08E 30F6 FA42 B269 B860 352B ED6E F59B)
> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys ED6EF59B
On 5/25/06, Paul Baranowski wrote:
> There two tabs in the comment screen - "Moderate" and "Approved". I
> dont like this wording because one is a verb and the other is an
> adjective. Instead of "Moderate", how about "Inbox" or "Pending" or
> anything else that works with "Approved".
>
> - Paul
>
I agree with Paul that the current names are not good. Ideally, it should
say "To be moderated" or "For moderation", but why make the tab label long.
So we need something short.
Braja also has a point. New and Approved (or even Published), would be
consistent with the rest of Campsite. Now is there a reason to
differentiate between comment management and general publishing? Maybe
not... So New and Published?
this is from Braja, whose tol.org address was not recognized by sympa (it
will be as of today)
why not just follow the CS wording?
NEW and APPROVED
or even more closely
NEW and PUBLISHED
> Pending over Inbox -- or Unapproved?
>
> On 5/25/06, Paul Baranowski wrote:
>> There two tabs in the comment screen - "Moderate" and "Approved". I
>> dont like this wording because one is a verb and the other is an
>> adjective. Instead of "Moderate", how about "Inbox" or "Pending" or
>> anything else that works with "Approved".
>>
>> - Paul
>>
>
>
> --
> Hartman's Brain Consulting | Openflows Networks Ltd.
>
> gpg 1024D/ED6EF59B (7D1A 522F D08E 30F6 FA42 B269 B860 352B ED6E F59B)
> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys ED6EF59B
On 5/25/06, Paul Baranowski wrote:
> There two tabs in the comment screen - "Moderate" and "Approved". I
> dont like this wording because one is a verb and the other is an
> adjective. Instead of "Moderate", how about "Inbox" or "Pending" or
> anything else that works with "Approved".
>
> - Paul
>
What happens to consistency after we set custom workflow?
Ondra
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 11:19 +0200, sava.tatic@mdlf.org wrote:
> Now that I quoted Braja, here is my two cents.
>
> I agree with Paul that the current names are not good. Ideally, it should
> say "To be moderated" or "For moderation", but why make the tab label long.
> So we need something short.
>
> Braja also has a point. New and Approved (or even Published), would be
> consistent with the rest of Campsite. Now is there a reason to
> differentiate between comment management and general publishing? Maybe
> not... So New and Published?
>
> Any better ideas?
>
> Sava
>
>
>
> sava.tatic@mdlf.o
> rg To: campsite-dev@campware.org
> cc:
> 05/26/2006 11:10 Subject: Re: [campsite-dev] comment wording
> AM
> Please respond to
> campsite-dev
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> this is from Braja, whose tol.org address was not recognized by sympa (it
> will be as of today)
>
> why not just follow the CS wording?
> NEW and APPROVED
> or even more closely
> NEW and PUBLISHED
>
>
> > Pending over Inbox -- or Unapproved?
> >
> > On 5/25/06, Paul Baranowski wrote:
> >> There two tabs in the comment screen - "Moderate" and "Approved". I
> >> dont like this wording because one is a verb and the other is an
> >> adjective. Instead of "Moderate", how about "Inbox" or "Pending" or
> >> anything else that works with "Approved".
> >>
> >> - Paul
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Hartman's Brain Consulting | Openflows Networks Ltd.
> >
> > gpg 1024D/ED6EF59B (7D1A 522F D08E 30F6 FA42 B269 B860 352B ED6E F59B)
> > gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys ED6EF59B
>
>
>
> "Peter Hartman"
>
>
> campsite-dev@campware.org
>
> @gmail.com> cc:
>
> Subject: Re: [campsite-dev]
> comment wording
> 05/25/2006 07:06
>
> PM
>
> Please respond to
>
> campsite-dev
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Pending over Inbox -- or Unapproved?
>
> On 5/25/06, Paul Baranowski wrote:
> > There two tabs in the comment screen - "Moderate" and "Approved". I
> > dont like this wording because one is a verb and the other is an
> > adjective. Instead of "Moderate", how about "Inbox" or "Pending" or
> > anything else that works with "Approved".
> >
> > - Paul
> >
>
>
> --
> Hartman's Brain Consulting | Openflows Networks Ltd.
>
> gpg 1024D/ED6EF59B (7D1A 522F D08E 30F6 FA42 B269 B860 352B ED6E F59B)
> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys ED6EF59B
>
>
>
>
> Invest in Press Freedom: Visit http://www.mdlf.org/invest and buy MDLF's
> Free Press Investment Notes now!
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Invest in Press Freedom: Visit http://www.mdlf.org/invest and buy MDLF's
> Free Press Investment Notes now!
>
>
There will always be New and Published, as the beginning and the end of the
process, alpha and omega . In any case, unless we are considering adding
additional complexity to the comments management, we may as well stick to
the publishing terminology that current users are accustomed to.
Any other comments (pending?
Sava
Ondra Koutek To: campsite-dev@campware.org
cc:
05/26/2006 11:56 Subject: Re: [campsite-dev] comment wording
AM
Please respond to
campsite-dev
What happens to consistency after we set custom workflow?
Ondra
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 11:19 +0200, sava.tatic@mdlf.org wrote:
> Now that I quoted Braja, here is my two cents.
>
> I agree with Paul that the current names are not good. Ideally, it should
> say "To be moderated" or "For moderation", but why make the tab label
long.
> So we need something short.
>
> Braja also has a point. New and Approved (or even Published), would be
> consistent with the rest of Campsite. Now is there a reason to
> differentiate between comment management and general publishing? Maybe
> not... So New and Published?
>
> Any better ideas?
>
> Sava
>
>
>
> 05/26/2006 11:10 Subject: Re:
[campsite-dev] comment wording
> AM
> Please respond to
> campsite-dev
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> this is from Braja, whose tol.org address was not recognized by sympa (it
> will be as of today)
>
> why not just follow the CS wording?
> NEW and APPROVED
> or even more closely
> NEW and PUBLISHED
>
>
> > Pending over Inbox -- or Unapproved?
> >
> > On 5/25/06, Paul Baranowski wrote:
> >> There two tabs in the comment screen - "Moderate" and "Approved". I
> >> dont like this wording because one is a verb and the other is an
> >> adjective. Instead of "Moderate", how about "Inbox" or "Pending" or
> >> anything else that works with "Approved".
> >>
> >> - Paul
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Hartman's Brain Consulting | Openflows Networks Ltd.
> >
> > gpg 1024D/ED6EF59B (7D1A 522F D08E 30F6 FA42 B269 B860 352B ED6E
F59B)
> > gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys ED6EF59B
>
>
>
> "Peter Hartman"
>
>
> campsite-dev@campware.org
>
> @gmail.com> cc:
>
> Subject: Re:
[campsite-dev]
> comment wording
> 05/25/2006 07:06
>
> PM
>
> Please respond to
>
> campsite-dev
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Pending over Inbox -- or Unapproved?
>
> On 5/25/06, Paul Baranowski wrote:
> > There two tabs in the comment screen - "Moderate" and "Approved". I
> > dont like this wording because one is a verb and the other is an
> > adjective. Instead of "Moderate", how about "Inbox" or "Pending" or
> > anything else that works with "Approved".
> >
> > - Paul
> >
>
>
> --
> Hartman's Brain Consulting | Openflows Networks Ltd.
>
> gpg 1024D/ED6EF59B (7D1A 522F D08E 30F6 FA42 B269 B860 352B ED6E F59B)
> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys ED6EF59B
>
>
>
>
> Invest in Press Freedom: Visit http://www.mdlf.org/invest and buy MDLF's
> Free Press Investment Notes now!
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Invest in Press Freedom: Visit http://www.mdlf.org/invest and buy MDLF's
> Free Press Investment Notes now!
>
>
Invest in Press Freedom: Visit http://www.mdlf.org/invest and buy MDLF's
Free Press Investment Notes now!