> Can we see that image? I didn't find it as an attachment.
>
> Nenad
>
>
> On Wednesday 08 of June 2005 18:59, Paul Baranowski wrote:
>> It looks great! Comments below...
>>
>> charles truett wrote:
>>> I added the scratchpad merely because we had talked about it and i
>>> wanted to keep that discussion going. I can see how it would
>>> be useful in putting an article together.
>>
>> Here's what I can think of for the "Multiple Actions" that can be
>> taken from the scratchpad. But would it be useful? (Users, please
>> let us know!) Articles:
>> - publish/submit
>> - delete
>> - unlock
>> - schedule for automatic publishing
>> - duplicate
>> - translate
>>
>> Article single actions (how?):
>> - view article
>> - view attached images
>> - view topics
>> - view schedule
>>
>> Images/Multimedia:
>> - attach to current article
>> - delete
>>
>> Image Single Actions:
>> - view
>> - edit metadata
>>
>> Topics (?):
>> - assign to current article
>> - delete
>>
>>> i removed the"back to edit" button and instead put the edit and
>>> image functions on tabs. I think this works nicely. There could
>>> conceivably be additional tabs, perhaps a metadata tab, that we
>>> could easily add later if needed.
>>
>> This looks nice. We also need a place for actions on the entire
>> article: publish/submit, preview, delete, translate, duplicate,
>> unlock. This would have to be outside of the tabs.
>>
>> The tabs would be: article, images, topics, automatic publishing.
>>
>>> I changed the wording on the add buttons, to better differentiate
>>> between the two functions - ATTACH just links an image already in
>>> the library to an article, but IMPORT actually imports an new
>>> image into the campsite library. Then to remove the image from the
>>> article you "DETACH" it, and to delete it from the library your
>>> "DELETE" it. two different words makes it clearer I think.
>>
>> Yes, thats much better!
>>
>>> I cleaned up the navbar and breadcrumbs area. we can add the icons.
>>> I'd like to develop our own unique set, but
>>> that's up for discussion still.
>>
>> I would love to have our own icons. Just send me a new set, and I
>> will add them!
>>
>>> In Live Support the top area by the logo serves as the master
>>> palette. Last week we discussed possibly having something analagous
>>> in Campsite. I'm not sure we decided what that would be, but I'd
>>> like to keep discussing that as well.
>>
>> I think this current screenshot would look fine without the logo.
>> However, I do think the logo should be in there somewhere. The only
>> thing I can think of to put at the top would be the list of articles
>> that are going to be published or have recently been published. This
>> is similar what this area is used for in LiveSupport.
>>
>> Also, do we want to use the same color scheme as LiveSupport? I
>> think it would be more obvious that we were in a different
>> application if we used different colors.
>>
>> - Paul
>
>